The case of Fox v Perry (2003) says that where a Judge relied on the credibility of the witness, you may be entitled to challenge trial conclusion based on such evidence.
Trespass to Goods/Chattels
Table of Contents
What is Trespass?
What is a Chattel?
What are the Elements of Trespass to Chattels?
The elements of trespass to chattels are as follows:
Interference a Result of Defendant’s Act
The interference with the plaintiff’s right to possession of the chattel must be a direct consequence of the defendant’s act.3 Simply handling someone else’s goods without their authority or consent can theoretically constitute trespass.4 Commonly, however, it is the act of stealing or otherwise taking a chattel that is typically litigated as trespass. There is also no need for the plaintiff to show actual or material damage to the chattel to plead a cause of action in trespass.
It must be clear that the defendant was at fault by interfering with the chattel. Liability will not arise if the Court discovers that the interference was not intentional, and the defendant was not negligent.5
Trespass to Chattels has some elements and features that are analogous to, or overlap with, the Tort of Detinue and the Tort of Conversion. Commonly, a party who has suffered loss and damage will sue for all three torts with the aim of being successful for at least one of these actions.
Although care needs to be taken, there can be advantages to suing for multiple causes of action in the same proceedings, including because there are certain differences in the elements between the three torts that protect goods.
Consequently, casting a wide net may protect a plaintiff’s prospects when commencing proceedings.
Defences for Trespass to Chattels
If you have been accused of trespass to chattel, there are certain defences that may be available to you, including but not limited to:
A defendant may be able to establish a defence to trespass if the interference occurred with the plaintiff’s consent. Consent can either be express or implied by conduct; however, it must be genuine and voluntary.8 The onus is on the defendant to establish that they interfered with the chattel with the plaintiff’s consent.9
Inevitable accident is a defence that apply in circumstances where the defendant can show that their conduct was involuntary, and accordingly, the defendant is without fault.12 The onus on establishing this defence is on the defendant, who must show that their conduct was neither intentional nor negligent, and the interference with the chattel was a result of an inevitable accident.13
There may be a defence to trespass if the defendant is a minor who can establish their inability to understand the true nature of the act committed.15 This would seem to indicate that a defence based on incapacity would only cover young children up to about four years of age.16
A defendant may be able to establish a defence to trespass if the defendant can prove that reasonable force was used to retake goods to which the defendant has a better right to possession than the plaintiff, or where the goods were wrongfully taken from the defendant by the plaintiff.17
Remedies for Trespass to Chattel
If you wish to bring a claim for trespass to chattel or land, there are various remedies that may be available to you, including:
Compensatory damages applies if damage to the chattel has been sustained or not capable of being returned. The aim for this type of damages is to put an injured person in the same situation as they would have been in had the trespass not been committed.18
Trespass is a tort of strict liability, which means that nominal damages (i.e. damages awarded to a person who has suffered a legal wrong) apply even where no actual damage has been sustained by the plaintiff.19
An injunction is a Court order preventing a party from doing something, or alternatively, forcing a party to do a specific thing. In order for the Court to grant an injunction, the Court must be satisfied that the damages suffered by the plaintiff are significant (such as where the trespass is ongoing).20
Exemplary damages, also referred to as punitive damages (i.e. damages awarded in order to punish the defendant and deterring others from engaging in similar conduct) may be awarded in certain circumstances involving trespass to chattels. Exemplary damages (although not traditionally so) are available for any tort.
For when you need Assistance
 Penfolds Wines Pry Ltd v Elliott (1946) 74 CLR 204.
 Wilson v Lombank Ltd  1 WLR 1294.
 Hutchins v Maughan  VLR 131.
 Barker v Furlong  2 Ch 172.
 National Coal Board v J E Evans & Co (Cardiff) Ltd  2 KB 861.
 Rigby v Chief Constable of Northamptonshire  1 WLR 1242.
 Proudman v Allen  SASR 366.
 Pwllbach Colliery Co Ltd v Woodman  AC 63; Lyttelton Times Co Ltd v Warners Ltd  AC 476.
 Plenty v Dillon (1991) 171 CLR 635, 647.
 Ryan v Simon George & Sons Pty Ltd & Anor  QSC 247.
 Toyota Finance Australia Ltd v Dennis (2002) 58 NSWLR 101.
 McHale v Watson (1964) 111 CLR 384.
 Blacker v Waters (1928) 28 SR (NSW) 406.
 Colwill v Reeves (1811) 2 Camp 575.
 McHale v Watson (1964) 111 CLR 384; Registrar of Titles (WA) v Spencer (1909) 9 CLR 641.
 Allen v Chadwich (2014) 120 SARS 350.
 Kearry v Pattinson  1 KB 471; Mitchell v Norman; Ex parte Norman  Qd R 587.
 Livingstone v Rawyards Coal Co (1880) 5 App Cas 25.
 TCN Channel Nine Pty Ltd v Anning  NSWCA 82.
 Shelfer v City of London Electric Lighting Co  1 Ch 287.
The content of this publication is intended as general commentary only and may not be suitable or applicable to your personal circumstances. It is not intended to replace independent legal advice. You can contact us at our Brisbane Office for a free consultation on a range of litigation matters on (07) 3088 6364.
Was this article helpful?
ABOUT GIBBS WRIGHT
Gibbs Wright is a Queensland litigation law firm based in Brisbane that exclusively practices in civil and commercial litigation, negotiation and dispute resolution throughout Queensland, Australia.
In this case, the implications of delays in amending pleadings for those involved in litigation are laid bare.
A guide to the process of contesting the rules and regulations made by governments and agencies.
A comprehensive guide of rule 222 of the UCPR for practitioners and self-represented litigants. We discuss when a rule 222 request applies, when it doesn’t apply and we also ask and answer a range of frequently asked questions.
If you have a dispute in Queensland, we can help resolve it.
A comprehensive guide to Defamation Law in Australia and how it works.
When do you have a contractual right to terminate a contract? Learn to identify when repudiation occurs and how it can affect your contracts.
Injurious Falsehood bears a resemblance to the tort of defamation. Learn what sets it apart and how it can affect you.